Respected experts.
Robust reports.
Responsive service.
Clinical negligence and personal injury medicolegal reports from experienced expert witnesses
Featured article
Consultant Psychiatrist
Dr Priscilla Kent
Bipolar disorder is one of the most challenging psychiatric conditions to diagnose accurately. In this blog we explore the complexities of the disorder, the importance of early and accurate diagnosis and treatment options.
Featured expert
Dr Rishi Khanna
Consultant in Pain Management
Dr Rishi Khanna specialises in spinal, abdominopelvic and neuropathic pain.
Dr Khanna has upcoming availability in Bingley (near Bradford) on 28 October, 4 November and 11 November.
Upcoming consultation dates
Mr Pundrique Sharma
Consultant Plastic Surgeon
31 October – St Albans
11 November – Liverpool
28 November – London
What can we help you find?
Our focus on client service
We’re a team of expert medical witnesses and highly skilled case managers. We are available for single or joint instructions by solicitors working for the claimant or defendant, in cases involving personal injury or medical negligence.
We understand that some solicitors prefer to instruct medico legal experts through an agency and we are very happy to accept instructions in this way. We have good working relationships with a number of well-known and well-respected medico legal agencies across the UK.
Our dedicated case managers oversee every instruction. We all work as an extension to your team, proactively contacting you if we identify a problem and making ourselves available if you need to discuss your case. It’s this unique and personal interest in each case that creates the long-lasting relationships that we build with our clients.
What we do
Respected experts
We’re all leaders in our fields and recognised by our profession, peer group and patients as leading clinicians in our areas of specialism.
You can be assured that our knowledge, skills, clinical and medico legal practice are, and will remain, up-to-date. We’re all currently in clinical practice with extensive NHS experience, in addition to our private practice.
Robust reports
Our reports are thorough, jargon-free and written for courtroom clarity. Every single one is reviewed to ensure consistency.
We receive first-rate feedback for their content, clarity and structure. Whether written independently or jointly, they will stand the test of scrutiny and challenge.
Responsive service
You’ll find that we’re easy to get hold of, by phone/email. Our case managers take responsibility for overseeing every stage of the report process, liaising proactively with you and your clients.
Our regular clinic schedule and wide variety of locations ensures convenience for claimants and reduces waiting times significantly.
Our experts
See what people are saying about us
Our latest insights
Treatment options for lumbar spinal stenosis and their medicolegal implications
by Dr Rishi Khanna, Consultant in Anaesthesia and Pain Management
14 October 2025
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) causes nerve compression leading to pain and mobility issues. While conservative treatments are preferred, surgery is an option for severe cases but carries notable risks. From a medicolegal perspective, informed consent, clear communication of risks and benefits, and proper patient selection are essential to prevent litigation over poor outcomes.
The use of robotics in spinal surgery and the medicolegal implications
10 October 2025
Robotics confer several advantages when used in spinal surgery. First, the accuracy of screw placement is enhanced compared to those inserted freehand, with some studies reporting a misplacement rate approaching zero. Second, exposure to fluoroscopy is significantly reduced, benefitting not only the patient but also the surgeon and other operating theatre personnel.
Case study: cauda equina
30 September 2025
This case study describes a male patient with cauda equina syndrome (CES) initially misdiagnosed as sciatica. Delayed MRI and surgery led to prolonged nerve compression, resulting in permanent neurological complications despite eventual pain relief. The case raises concerns about delayed diagnosis and potential clinical negligence.